Rear End Swap

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
tjg_26
New Member
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Minnesota, Detroit Lakes

Rear End Swap

Post by tjg_26 »

Greetings everyone, I have a 1971 Ford F-100. I put in a 390 out of a 1978 F-150 (yes in 78' they had 390's in commercial trucks). The guy i bought the truck from had a little 302 and a car rear end in for speed, not power. Now I have the rear end from the 78' still. would it be better to have a new driveshaft made, or swap the rear end?

Thanks, Tyler
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: Rear End Swap

Post by FORDification »

That rearend won't fit. The spring pads are farther apart on those truck's rearends. The third member will fit your existing housing, but it's probably set up for 31-spline axles (as opposed to 28-spline axles in yours now), and the longer axles won't fit your current housing.

You'd either have to move the spring pads to get that rearend assembly in there, or try to find some fairly-rare 31-spline axles that'll fit your existing narrower housing.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
pat67shorty
New Member
New Member
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Washington, Tumwater
Contact:

Post by pat67shorty »

How much wider are the 73-79 rear ends than the 67-72?
'67 SWB, 1970 car 390, Edelbrock Streetmaster intake, MSD 6AL, 780 Holley, Hedman headers, 2.5 duals, 3.54 D44 L/S, C6.
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: Rear End Swap

Post by FORDification »

On the '67-'72 trucks the rear track width is narrower than the front....that is, the rear wheels don't track directly behind the front. In '73 when the rear frame rails on most trucks was widened out 4", the rearends also became 4" wider, which brings the rear wheels out to track directly behind the fronts.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
binder56jd
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: Ok ra homa, Ardmore
Contact:

re: Rear End Swap

Post by binder56jd »

what was the reason behind the narrow rear?
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here" — Jack Nicholson, As Good As it Gets

now serving #235

"the only way to believe in the American dream is to be asleep"--GC

How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. - Benjamin Disraeli
User avatar
SmokeyBear
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 367
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:41 am
Location: Kentucky

Re: re: Rear End Swap

Post by SmokeyBear »

binder56jd wrote:what was the reason behind the narrow rear?
They aren't married yet.


























:D

Historically older vehicles just had a narrower frame. As technology caught up the frames got wider to stabilize the vehicle.
70 F-100 XLT
"Christine" Gone but not forgotten.
72 F-100 Ranger XLT
User avatar
ToughOldFord
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Communist California, USA

re: Rear End Swap

Post by ToughOldFord »

:lolprev:
User avatar
binder56jd
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: Ok ra homa, Ardmore
Contact:

re: Rear End Swap

Post by binder56jd »

:lol: :lol: :lol: funny guy :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: i didn't see that one coming :lol: :lol: :lol:
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here" — Jack Nicholson, As Good As it Gets

now serving #235

"the only way to believe in the American dream is to be asleep"--GC

How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. - Benjamin Disraeli
tjg_26
New Member
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Minnesota, Detroit Lakes

Post by tjg_26 »

thanks everyone. I have a different question now. Are the driveshafts the same for stock rearend 1971 and 1978 engine/tranny? they are both half ton trucks, and are both 8 foot box trucks.

If so, I am going to the junkyard and pull the rearend and driveshaft out of a early 70's truck.

Thanks,
Tyler
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

the 78 had a one piece drive shaft as where the long beds of 67-72 had a two piece driveshaft.
Post Reply