Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Discuss your workshop and related equipment

Moderator: FORDification

killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by killakobra »

i'm sure it's not healthy but i've been using screened river sand. bought 3/4 ton for $12. i do wear a hood and a mask when blasting though.
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
User avatar
dablack00
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:32 am
Location: Texas, Lufkin

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by dablack00 »

killakobra wrote:i'm sure it's not healthy but i've been using screened river sand. bought 3/4 ton for $12. i do wear a hood and a mask when blasting though.
It is your life, but there is no reason to waste it. A simple dust mask isn't going to cut it. Also, if you lived anywhere near me and was doing that, I would sue you into nothingness. You might as well be spraying poison.

Please check this out:
http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch049/ch049i.html

What you are doing is more than "not healthy", it is down right deadly.
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by killakobra »

yes i know. I've got a respirator i wear (should have been more specific). from what it sounds like, coal slag doesn't seem much better. black lung anyone? could be wrong but inhaling any particulate isn't exactly healthy.
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
Fordnatic
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by Fordnatic »

Baking soda is the safest. Doesn't work on the heavy stuff, but will take off paint nicely--without harming glass or rubber also. Leaves metal looking like the day it was painted at the factory.
70F100: 410 Merc with tri-power, close ratio toploader, 4.56 detroit locker 9"
68F100 4x4: 390, 4 spd/NP 205, Rancho 4" urethane susp, 35x12.50 All Terrain T/A's
55F100
01F150 Daily Driver: TP tunes, AF1 intake, elec fans, Magnaflow exh, underdrive pulleys, Centerlines
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by robroy »

killakobra wrote:yes i know. I've got a respirator i wear (should have been more specific). from what it sounds like, coal slag doesn't seem much better. black lung anyone? could be wrong but inhaling any particulate isn't exactly healthy.
Hi KillaKobra!

Sorry if this is all stuff you're already aware of, but I thought it couldn't hurt to point it out.

While it's true that coal slag probably isn't so great to breathe, there's something special about river and beach sand. When the particles collide with iron at high speed they release silica dust, which is one of the most deadly things for the lungs. It causes scar tissue to form over each spec of silica, and the scar tissue is there for good--that part of the lung will never heal again. Silicosis is the name of that disease and lots of people died from it before folks knew this about using beach/river sand in sandblasting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicosis

The silica dust particles that are deadly to the lungs are tiny. They're so tiny that respirators are ineffective against them--they go right through in to the lungs. So the only way to blast safely with river/beach sand is with a supplied air system (usually an air tank on your back), and that's naturally super expensive.

Most sandblasting media you buy specifically for that purpose these days doesn't generate silica dust when used so it's a lot safer. Glass beads, aluminum oxide, and crushed garnet are some that don't generate silica, as far as I've been able to gather from reading around about it.

As I understand it, this knowledge of the hazard of beach/river sand is pretty new. Even as recently as the early 1990's its hazards weren't commonly agreed upon.

Maybe somebody else knows a lot more about this and would care to add more details?

-Robroy
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by killakobra »

hmm. yea, it rings a bell. AP bio actually pays off. did a bit of a quick search and misting water is one way of controlling silica dust. would it be possible to use a wet cloth along with a resporator to trap the dust?
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by killakobra »

Fordnatic wrote:Baking soda is the safest. Doesn't work on the heavy stuff, but will take off paint nicely--without harming glass or rubber also. Leaves metal looking like the day it was painted at the factory.

won't really help in my situation. the past 40 havn't been kind to my two ton paper weight.
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
User avatar
dablack00
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:32 am
Location: Texas, Lufkin

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by dablack00 »

I got a supplied air set up for about $400. You need it for blasting, painting and other stuff. The great thing is, you can pull the air from a cooler and the air you are breathing is about 50 degrees. I love that thing. It can be 100 degrees in my garage but with my supplied air set up I can be painting and I feel nice and cool. Gotta love it.

So, please, don't blast or paint with anything but a supplied air setup. Life is too short to not save the extra $400 and do it right and safe.
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by robroy »

I second the recommendation for the supplied air setup. And the health safety benefits of this should make it an easy thing to convince a relative to lend you the cash for if you don't already have it on hand. :)

I bought a HobbyAir 1 from Eastwood during one of their sales. I think the total came to around $500.

It has 40 feet of air hose coming from the pump, which is barely adequate. If I were buying again I would spend more and get the HobbyAir 2 with 80 feet of hose. The HobbyAir 2 is something I wasn't even aware of until I ordered mine because it's not sold through the Eastwood catalog.

One thing I haven't been able to get working perfectly yet is the seal the air mask makes around my face. From time to time I smell paint when I'm working with it, which I'm sure is never supposed to happen.

Another benefit of this full face mask type of system: you get a face shield that never fogs up, since it has air blowing across it constantly. You know how regular face shields fog up after a minute or two.

-Robroy
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by robroy »

killakobra wrote:hmm. yea, it rings a bell. AP bio actually pays off. did a bit of a quick search and misting water is one way of controlling silica dust. would it be possible to use a wet cloth along with a resporator to trap the dust?
Hey Killakobra!

It might help, but in my opinion, it's still an unreasonable gamble. And the trouble is that it's not possible to tell whether it's helping or not--the silica dust is so fine there's no way for a human to detect it, as far as I know. So with this method, you wouldn't know until way down the road whether it worked or not, and, naturally, it wouldn't be a nice thing to discover one day in the hospital with trouble breathing!

BTW: have you noticed that respirators, regardless of where you get them, say somewhere in the fine print that they're not intended for use with abrasive blasting? That's 'cause the silica dust goes right through them.

-Robroy
User avatar
Brokenarrow
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Western Oklahoma

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by Brokenarrow »

How about soda-ash? :hmm: Anyone tried it in a blaster?
'68 SWB f100, 401ci FE/C6, '68 Mustang fastback (restoration in progress)
Image
2013 F150 KingRanch (ecoboost), '48 8N tractor


"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are."
— John Wooden
killakobra
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by killakobra »

i've seen the blaster for it and i've read about it but that's as close as i've gotten to soda blasting.
1967 f100 stepside 300ci I6
1969 f100/600 stepside retro truck -under construction-
1972 longbed trailer
marxtoys
New Member
New Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: Middle o' Oregon

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by marxtoys »

I sort of have the impression that the only 'safe' way to get all the crud off these old parts is to haul them to someone who does this stuff and remain upwind 'til they're done.

That crusty black factory undercoating is loaded with asbestos, and all our pretty red-orange-yellow paint is full of lead... other colors - other nasty metals... and the list can go on.


So anyway..... have the folks at Black Whatever come up with some miracle method of removing the arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, and, oh yeah a bonus, radioactivity - from their coal spew? or is it like that power plant stuff that's been in the news lately? Hey, maybe it comes from "clean coal"!

:hn:
"Knowledge is Good." Emil Faber
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by robroy »

marxtoys wrote:That crusty black factory undercoating is loaded with asbestos
Hey Marxtoys! Thanks for replying! That's very interesting and surprising to me that asbestos is in that stuff. Do you happen to remember your source for this information? Just wondering if this is a well documented fact?

Thanks again!
-Robroy
marxtoys
New Member
New Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: Middle o' Oregon

Re: Abrasive blast materials that are easy on the lungs?

Post by marxtoys »

robroy wrote:
marxtoys wrote:That crusty black factory undercoating is loaded with asbestos
Hey Marxtoys! Thanks for replying! That's very interesting and surprising to me that asbestos is in that stuff. Do you happen to remember your source for this information? Just wondering if this is a well documented fact?

Thanks again!
-Robroy
Here's one.

Have to admit that I only read the abstract, which mentions "the relatively high concentrations (5.6 – 28%)(emphasis mine) of chrysotile fibers detected within bulk samples of seam sealant" but says that a lot less goes into the air when scraping by hand instead of using an air hammer with a scraper blade. I would imagine that a wire wheel or a sandblaster would break the stuff up and put it all in the air.

Image
"Knowledge is Good." Emil Faber
Post Reply